Pages

Showing posts with label Magnetic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magnetic. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

'Breaking Bad' Recap: A Magnetic Personality

They used a big magnet to solve a big problem on a little laptop, yeah. But  in the words of Walter White, there were bigger fish to fry on "Live Free or Die," Breaking Bad's fifth and (technically) final season premiere.

Comic capers are usually prime midseason material for this show. How will Walt account for his multi-day disappearance after Tuco Salamanca kidnaps him? How can Walt and Jesse keep Hank from finding them inside the meth-lab RV? How can Walt get out of bugging Gus' car on Hank's behalf in the Los Pollos Hermanos parking lot? The resulting hijinx are agonizingly tense and darkly hilarious, but rarely the stuff of a season premiere's high emotional stakes – they were nothing compared to the cancer diagnosis and deal-gone-bad of the pilot, or getting in deep with Tuco in Season Two, or the aftermath of the plane crash and the separation from Skyler in Season Three, or finding out whether Gus would kill them for killing Gale in Season Four. So an episode that prominently features False Kramer and whose magnet-based plot often seemed just seconds away from Jesse quoting the Insane Clown Posse seems like an unusual, and maybe even disappointing, choice.

Video: Bryan Cranston on Ending 'Breaking Bad'

But Walt's MacGyver-meets-Magneto routine was just a MacGuffin, a ruse necessary to hide the episode's true task: quietly but firmly yanking the rug out from under Mr. White's newfound badassery.

For pretty much all of the men-behaving-badly prestige TV dramas, competence is kryptonite. Sure, the point of the Sopranos, Mad Men and so on is to depict the perils of a life lived amorally. But as long as Tony can whack assholes and fuck strippers at will, as long as Don Draper looks great in a suit and can sell ice to Eskimos in a pitch meeting, a goodly portion of the audience will seize on the power of being able to get exactly what you want when you want it and ignore the rest. It's a competence fantasy.

From the first episode forward, Breaking Bad had gone farther than its peers in refusing to give its antihero his moments of hypercompetent rad-dude-itude. He doesn't even get to establish a status quo in which he's basically doing a good job, like Don or Tony; his meth operation is a cascading series of lethal catastrophes from episode one. When Walt has gone alpha-male on us, it's usually been petty (blowing up some loudmouth's sports car), dopey (bragging to Hank about how the real mastermind behind blue meth is still out there) or creepy ("I AM THE ONE WHO KNOCKS").

Walter White's 10 Lowest Lows on 'Breaking Bad'

But at the end of Season Four, Walter White blew up the most powerful criminal in North America. That wasn't a bark-worse-than-his-bite moment, like spooking some methhead at the Home Depot: that was legitimately hypercompetent! How can showrunner/writer Vince Gilligan, director Michael Slovis and their crew continue to tell Walt's story without transforming him into a boringly awesome action-movie villain? How can the show proceed without becoming something other than what it was?

"Live Free or Die" solved the problem in three ways. First, in tried and true Breaking Bad fashion, it gave us a glimpse of a mysterious, fucked-up future. Walt's operating under a fake name with a car and ID from New Hampshire (the location of the breakup with his grad-school girlfriend Gretchen that shut him out of the company he co-founded, if I recall correctly – Google does nothing for me here). He's haggard, dirty, even gaunt. (Fuckin' Cranston – how does he work?) Both his hair and his cancer-cough are back, and he's popping pills. He shows a rare glimpse of kindly old Mr. White when he briefly enthuses about a science museum with a Denny's waitress. And he's buying a machine gun from his gun dealer, Lawson (the great Jim "Ellsworth" Beaver). "It's never leaving town," he assures the dealer, who is apparently a real upstanding citizen who doesn't want it falling into Mexican hands.  The implication, of course, is that Walt won't leave town either – not alive, anyway. "I won," he told Skyler at the end of Season Four, but his victory is short-lived. Or as Mike might put it, "You know, I can foresee a lot of possible outcomes to this thing, and not a single one of them involves 'Miller Time.'" No amount of PMA will keep Walt from his appointment with that M60.

Second, it may have planted the seed for that eventual downfall, in the form of the Cayman Islands bank account number unearthed from the photo of Gus and his slain business (and more?) partner during Walt, Jesse and Mike's magnet raid on the evidence room. Fring's resources, and his connections to people more powerful even than he was, have often been mentioned but never remotely explained. There's the German business conglomerate responsible for his lab equipment. There's… whoever he knew or whatever he did in Chile that got all records of him wiped out before his emigration to Mexico, and which prevented the cartel from killing him alongside his partner. The Chicken Man may have been the eye in the pyramid, but there are potentially a ton of bricks between him and the foundation of the operation, and they're all poised to come crashing down on Walt. The show cleverly faked us out by making it seem that leaving the truck behind – first by possibly getting stuck on that curb, then by tipping over when Walt turned the magnet up to 11 – would be their undoing, only for Walt to insist the truck, and their getaway, were both clean. I love it when I get a chance to write the phrase "little did he know," you know?

Most fundamentally, "Live Free or Die" cut the Walter White competence fantasy off at the knees by showing us the Walter White sociopath reality. Simply put: What a fucking creep this guy is. Lest we forget that his grand triumph over Gus involved poisoning an innocent child, the episode reminds us twice: first when Walt tosses his poisonous Lily of the Valley plant away with all the other evidence, second when Saul Goodman complains about how Walt involved him and his goon Huell in the operation. "Too sleazy for Saul Goodman" is never someplace you want your life to be.

Then there's his cock-of-the-walk confidence about the magnet raid. Questioned about everything that could have gone wrong by an increasingly stupefied Mike – who, before he heard about Walt's hit on Gus out in his desert hospital, was literally watching his chickens come home to roost – Walt replies, with someone-please-break-this-guy's-nose-again arrogance, that everything went fine "because I say so." You can't enjoy someone's success when they're being such a dick about it.

Finally – and literally so, since it was the last line of the episode – "I forgive you." That line from Walt to Skyler, who'd just gotten back from visiting the former lover whom she'd inadvertently turned into a character from a cringe-comedy version of Hellraiser to keep their low-level criminality from exposing Walt's high-level version, blew my sympathy for Walt apart like Tio Salamanca ringing his bell. Walt is always the selfless hero, always the wronged party, no longer able to admit wrongdoing or honestly evaluate the consequences of his increasingly abhorrent actions to the people he loves and purports to protect. This is the cost of the competence fantasy.

We see some of this rub off on Skyler herself, with her chilling reply to poor, sad-eyed Ted Beneke's promise not to tell on her. Her ice-cold response of "Good" helped offset a sense that we'd been there, done that with her interaction with Walt this episode. That "I'm scared of you" exchange they had felt like a retread of her great "Someone has to protect this family from the man who protects this family" line from last season, not to mention how firmly established here fear of Walt was by her Shelley-Duvall-walking-in-on-the-dogman-blowing-the-tuxedo-guy reaction to Walt's cackling in the crawlspace shortly thereafter.

As always with Breaking Bad premieres, hints of the future come hard and fast. Obviously those include the opening sequence and Gus's hidden account. Given the games BB has played in the past, I wonder if there's something more to the "52" Walt makes out of his bacon (LOL Breaking Bad and breakfast) than simply his age. The score from composer Dave Porter, which over the seasons has shifted from Southwestern rattlesnake slither to eerie industrial-music buzz, added big bell-like tones – an ominously funereal shift. And with his cane and his limp and his total vindication, Hank is even more of an Ahab figure, relentlessly chasing his White whale in a sea of Blue.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon Music and MP3 Center

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros Present New Album In L.A.

Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros

"We just became ready to play these songs three minutes ago," Edward Sharpe frontman Alex Ebert quipped as he led his expanded Magnetic Zeros, all 10 of them, onto a tiny Santa Monica stage. Playing for about 200 fans at Bob Clearmountain's Berkeley Street Studio, Ebert and band took the opportunity to, as he put it, "present" their new album, Here, which is due out May 29th.

The set opened with the lead single "Man on Fire," which started with a slow build and turned into an invigorating pop rocker. While the song also kicks off the new album, the band didn't play the nine new tracks in order, creating a new sequence that showed off Ebert's assertion, during a mid-set interview with KCRW DJ Liza Richardson, that the new album was more of a full-band project.

Photos: Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros

Jade Castrinos sang lead on the second track, the bluesy "Fiyawata," while guitarist Christian Letts took the vocal reins on the sweet "Child." There were several other highlights as well, from the uplifting, gospel-flavored "I Don't Wanna Pray" (which Ebert called "probably the most dangerous song on the record") to "That's What's Up," a big, happy cornucopia of noise that ended with Ebert and Castrinos sharing a big smile and a high five.

But the standout of the night may have been the absolutely gorgeous "All Wash Out," which found Ebert sitting in the middle of the floor surrounded by the seated audience. "This is really cool, everyone sitting on the floor," he said. The communal vibe of the song climaxed with everyone snapping their fingers in unison to Ebert's soft whistling and an a cappella sing-along.

In keeping with the joyousness of the performance, the group closed with what Ebert described as a "children's song." The performance will premiere on KCRW's "Morning Becomes Eclectic" May 29th, the record’s release date.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon Music and MP3 Center

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros Present New Album In L.A.

Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros

"We just became ready to play these songs three minutes ago," Edward Sharpe frontman Alex Ebert quipped as he led his expanded Magnetic Zeros, all 10 of them, onto a tiny Santa Monica stage. Playing for about 200 fans at Bob Clearmountain's Berkeley Street Studio, Ebert and band took the opportunity to, as he put it, "present" their new album, Here, which is due out May 29th.

The set opened with the lead single "Man on Fire," which started with a slow build and turned into an invigorating pop rocker. While the song also kicks off the new album, the band didn't play the nine new tracks in order, creating a new sequence that showed off Ebert's assertion, during a mid-set interview with KCRW DJ Liza Richardson, that the new album was more of a full-band project.

Photos: Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros

Jade Castrinos sang lead on the second track, the bluesy "Fiyawata," while guitarist Christian Letts took the vocal reins on the sweet "Child." There were several other highlights as well, from the uplifting, gospel-flavored "I Don't Wanna Pray" (which Ebert called "probably the most dangerous song on the record") to "That's What's Up," a big, happy cornucopia of noise that ended with Ebert and Castrinos sharing a big smile and a high five.

But the standout of the night may have been the absolutely gorgeous "All Wash Out," which found Ebert sitting in the middle of the floor surrounded by the seated audience. "This is really cool, everyone sitting on the floor," he said. The communal vibe of the song climaxed with everyone snapping their fingers in unison to Ebert's soft whistling and an a cappella sing-along.

In keeping with the joyousness of the performance, the group closed with what Ebert described as a "children's song." The performance will premiere on KCRW's "Morning Becomes Eclectic" May 29th, the record’s release date.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon MP3 Download Center

Monday, March 12, 2012

Mumford and Sons, Magnetic Zeroes to Play Free Show at SXSW 2012

Nearly a year after embarking on a unique week-long tour via railroad from San Francisco to New Orleans, Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeroes, Mumford and Sons and Old Crow Medicine Show will celebrate the premiere screening of a documentary about the trek with a massive free show in Austin, Texas next week during the South By Southwest festival.

As was previously announced, Big Easy Express, a 67-minute film directed by Emmett Malloy, will have its world premiere during SXSW on Saturday, March 17th, followed by a brief acoustic set featuring members of the three bands. But today the bands’ fans received an alert about an additional screening of "Big Easy Express" and even bigger performance on the field of Austin High School, to be presented by MySpace. 10,000 tickets will be distributed to fans who RSVP via MySpace.com/BigEasyExpress, and the event will also be open to SXSW badgeholders. MySpace will webcast the concert live and offer an HD version the following day.

"The memories from that tour are tattooed on my mind," Magnetic Zeroes multi-instrumentalist Nora Kirkpatrick tells Rolling Stone. "When I first saw the finished film, it reminded me of what radiant moments live performances can create, and how powerful a group of minds can be when focused on the same goal."

Last spring, I traveled along with the six-city "Railroad Revival Tour" all the way from San Francisco to New Orleans. Though close to 32,000 concertgoers attended the six shows along the way, the documentary will let viewers see for the first time how much music the bands made on board the fifteen vintage rail cars that carried them for the week. As stirring and impressive as the concerts were, the real magic happened on that train, with the musicians and assorted friends jamming until dawn every night. It was a truly remarkable thing to witness: Mumfords and Zeroes and Crows would pick up instruments and launch into extended improvisations ranging from low-key folk explorations to horn-led funk interludes to bluegrass sessions with several guitars, banjos, mandolins and percussion going at once.

"I'll bet this picture helps us sell another 10,000 banjos," says Old Crow Medicine Show frontman Ketch Secor. "Not to mention what it'll do for Amtrak. Like the song says, "John Henry was a steal-driving man" – well he was, it's true – and somewhere in some movie theatre of all places, somebody's going to hear his hammer ring for the very first time. There's not enough movies today that make you feel like that, that make you reconnect with something inside yourself that was always there, that old familiar voice of American song."

Director Malloy, who also filmed the 2010 White Stripes tour documentary Under Great White Northern Lights, says he remembers the final night of the tour with special fondness: Most of his crew had fallen asleep, but he kept shooting as Magnetic Zeroes frontman Alex Ebert led a group of musicians through a new song he’d started earlier that day. "What we got that night was pretty magical and ended up being the final scene of the film," he says.

"It’s not just the music," Mumford and Sons’ Ben Lovett told Rolling Stone while we were still out riding the rails. "Everyone on that train has something that they put into the melting pot of this really complicated but beautifully balanced concoction. There’s no feeling of segregation between the musicians and the friends and everyone who’s doing everything else on the train. It doesn’t feel like three bands separately furthering their audience fanbases or any of that shit. It’s like, everything’s taking a backseat and everyone on that train has mucked in to make it what it is."

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon Music and MP3 Center

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Mumford and Sons, Magnetic Zeroes to Play Free Show at SXSW 2012

Nearly a year after embarking on a unique week-long tour via railroad from San Francisco to New Orleans, Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeroes, Mumford and Sons and Old Crow Medicine Show will celebrate the premiere screening of a documentary about the trek with a massive free show in Austin, Texas next week during the South By Southwest festival.

As was previously announced, Big Easy Express, a 67-minute film directed by Emmett Malloy, will have its world premiere during SXSW on Saturday, March 17th, followed by a brief acoustic set featuring members of the three bands. But today the bands’ fans received an alert about an additional screening of "Big Easy Express" and even bigger performance on the field of Austin High School, to be presented by MySpace. 10,000 tickets will be distributed to fans who RSVP via MySpace.com/BigEasyExpress, and the event will also be open to SXSW badgeholders. MySpace will webcast the concert live and offer an HD version the following day.

"The memories from that tour are tattooed on my mind," Magnetic Zeroes multi-instrumentalist Nora Kirkpatrick tells Rolling Stone. "When I first saw the finished film, it reminded me of what radiant moments live performances can create, and how powerful a group of minds can be when focused on the same goal."

Last spring, I traveled along with the six-city "Railroad Revival Tour" all the way from San Francisco to New Orleans. Though close to 32,000 concertgoers attended the six shows along the way, the documentary will let viewers see for the first time how much music the bands made on board the fifteen vintage rail cars that carried them for the week. As stirring and impressive as the concerts were, the real magic happened on that train, with the musicians and assorted friends jamming until dawn every night. It was a truly remarkable thing to witness: Mumfords and Zeroes and Crows would pick up instruments and launch into extended improvisations ranging from low-key folk explorations to horn-led funk interludes to bluegrass sessions with several guitars, banjos, mandolins and percussion going at once.

"I'll bet this picture helps us sell another 10,000 banjos," says Old Crow Medicine Show frontman Ketch Secor. "Not to mention what it'll do for Amtrak. Like the song says, "John Henry was a steal-driving man" – well he was, it's true – and somewhere in some movie theatre of all places, somebody's going to hear his hammer ring for the very first time. There's not enough movies today that make you feel like that, that make you reconnect with something inside yourself that was always there, that old familiar voice of American song."

Director Malloy, who also filmed the 2010 White Stripes tour documentary Under Great White Northern Lights, says he remembers the final night of the tour with special fondness: Most of his crew had fallen asleep, but he kept shooting as Magnetic Zeroes frontman Alex Ebert led a group of musicians through a new song he’d started earlier that day. "What we got that night was pretty magical and ended up being the final scene of the film," he says.

"It’s not just the music," Mumford and Sons’ Ben Lovett told Rolling Stone while we were still out riding the rails. "Everyone on that train has something that they put into the melting pot of this really complicated but beautifully balanced concoction. There’s no feeling of segregation between the musicians and the friends and everyone who’s doing everything else on the train. It doesn’t feel like three bands separately furthering their audience fanbases or any of that shit. It’s like, everything’s taking a backseat and everyone on that train has mucked in to make it what it is."

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon MP3 Download Center

Friday, March 9, 2012

The Magnetic Fields Embrace Chance on Their 12th Album

Stephin Merritt of Magnetic Fields performs as part of the Noise Pop Festival. Stephin Merritt of Magnetic Fields performs as part of the Noise Pop Festival.

The Magnetic Fields' 12th album, Love at the Bottom of the Sea, finds the long-running indie group cycling back to its roots in synth-pop after three consecutive records that explored strings, distorted guitars and traditional folk instrumentation rather than using keyboards and synthesizers. Rolling Stone recently talked to songwriter and primary vocalist Stephin Merritt about embracing the element of chance on the new album, his experiences writing music for ad agencies and why he'd prefer to give up singing entirely.

What made you want to return to using keyboards on this new album?
Well, not keyboards. It's electronics. They hardly ever actually involve keyboards.

What exactly is the distinction between the devices?
With keyboards, you press a key down and hear a particular note, whereas with a lot of the instruments I was using, you just sort of twiddle the knobs and it behaves as it wants to. You set up a particular combination of knobs and it will sound like stampeding elephants rather than playing the note C. I wanted news ways of organizing sounds, sounds I had never worked with before, and I got interested in new instruments that were chance-based. There's a John Cage-like sense of experimentation and play, where if you don't like the results, you just don't use it.

What was attractive to you about embracing chance?
I don't like the word "perfectionist," but I'm very, very specific in my instructions. I feel like I know what the overall sound should be and no one else does, and I don't want to explain it. I just want people to follow my instructions and when they don't, I can't use what they recorded. It was good to be able to allow chance, but not have someone's feelings hurt if nothing they did got used. It was a nice removal of psychology for me, personally. Too much psychology in the recording studio, and a little psychiatry as well.

Were there songs that surprised you by coming out of this chance project that you might not have done otherwise?
None of the songs came out of it. I don't write in the studio at all. I write in bars, and I completely ignore the instrumentation when I'm writing a song. Basically, I write a record, decide what's going to be on it, and I go into the studio.

What was the rationale of having this particular batch of songs go through this recording process?
I had no rationale. I don't think of there being a theme. I actually haven't had a lyrical concept since 69 Love Songs.

Your previous two Magnetic Fields albums sort of commented on each other, with one being very distorted and the other being strictly acoustic, and in this album, the songs all have a similar musical approach. Do you want the records to have very distinct aesthetics?
I don't want to be like Roxy Music and make a slowly evolving palette. I like to react violently against the last record. I never get bored. I like to do whatever I didn't do at all the last time.

Some of the lyrics on the record seem very timely, particularly "The Machine in Your Hand" and "God Wants Us to Wait."
"God Wants Us to Wait" is 28 years old. Not the lyric, but almost everything else about it, it's something I recorded 28 years ago. It was originally 13 minutes long, so making it two minutes long was sort of difficult. The lyrical subject matter, I thought, was well within the mainstream of sex songs, except they're actually lying naked on the floor and only there and then does she say, "Let's wait until we get married." It's sort of the same thing as "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?"

What got cut out to get it down to two minutes?
There were many, many verses. And then there was soloing, sort of. There was a poly-rhythm section, with some things happening in different meters, crashing against each other and coming back into synch. It was made heavily under the influence of Can.

Is your impulse now to keep things very tight and brief?
Yeah. I'm not making it a crusade, as George Bush would say, but I am a fan of short songs. Most of the songs I listen to were recorded before 1970 and most of them originally came out on seven-inch; they're usually under three minutes long, and often under two minutes long.

When you write, do you find that the songs come out around that length, or are you still paring things down?
I think I'm finding that they just come out at that length. I've never really been a fan of the bridge, and I feel like with middle eights, I always write the same middle eight. We have to be careful about that in the setlist.

What inspired the song about smart phones, "The Machine in Your Hand"?
I was sitting around in gay bars, and when I'm writing there, I'm usually writing about what's happening around me, even though I don't seem to realize that at the time. What has increasingly been happening is that people in the gay bars are just staring at their glowing gadgets and literally never looking up except to order another drink. So they may as well not be there at all.

Do you feel that you are susceptible to the same thing with your phone?
Oh, absolutely. I have fallen into the terrible trap of playing Scrabble and Words with Friends. I'm sure in a week or two I will get very tired of this and end all these games, but in the interim, I'm playing word games with four different people, which becomes a full-time job. I think it's like the brief blip in my life, like the two weeks that I played Tetris until I started dreaming Tetris.

You mainly live in Los Angeles now, but you were in New York City for many years. Is there a difference between the gay bars in those cities, and does that influence how you write?
There is a different vibe in the bars in that everyone in California has to drive home, so there aren't people who sit there for eight hours getting drunk, but everyone does in New York. So alcoholism is sadly curtailed in Los Angeles.

Have you had many freelance songwriting jobs recently?
I just had two ad solicitations yesterday. Often [the clients] are uncertain. So if they are really, really uncertain, I'll walk away. I find that the clients at ad agencies don't know what they want, and why should they be able to know what they want? They are very inarticulate about telling you what they want, but they have terrible deadlines. It's a very difficult thing to do, so unless it seems like I will be able to do it with panache, then I think it's best for me not to try because it will probably fall through and have all of us tearing our hair out.

Are you ever approached to write for other artists?
Only by ad agencies, actually. I think it would be fun to write for most anyone, really. I am not fond of my voice, particularly. I'd be perfectly happy to never sing again in public. I would sing less than half the time [on Magnetic Fields records] if I could get away with it, but apparently I can't. I'm told that for commercial purposes, it would be a bad idea for me to stop singing on the records.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon Music and MP3 Center

The Magnetic Fields Embrace Chance on Their 12th Album

Stephin Merritt of Magnetic Fields performs as part of the Noise Pop Festival. Stephin Merritt of Magnetic Fields performs as part of the Noise Pop Festival.

The Magnetic Fields' 12th album, Love at the Bottom of the Sea, finds the long-running indie group cycling back to its roots in synth-pop after three consecutive records that explored strings, distorted guitars and traditional folk instrumentation rather than using keyboards and synthesizers. Rolling Stone recently talked to songwriter and primary vocalist Stephin Merritt about embracing the element of chance on the new album, his experiences writing music for ad agencies and why he'd prefer to give up singing entirely.

What made you want to return to using keyboards on this new album?
Well, not keyboards. It's electronics. They hardly ever actually involve keyboards.

What exactly is the distinction between the devices?
With keyboards, you press a key down and hear a particular note, whereas with a lot of the instruments I was using, you just sort of twiddle the knobs and it behaves as it wants to. You set up a particular combination of knobs and it will sound like stampeding elephants rather than playing the note C. I wanted news ways of organizing sounds, sounds I had never worked with before, and I got interested in new instruments that were chance-based. There's a John Cage-like sense of experimentation and play, where if you don't like the results, you just don't use it.

What was attractive to you about embracing chance?
I don't like the word "perfectionist," but I'm very, very specific in my instructions. I feel like I know what the overall sound should be and no one else does, and I don't want to explain it. I just want people to follow my instructions and when they don't, I can't use what they recorded. It was good to be able to allow chance, but not have someone's feelings hurt if nothing they did got used. It was a nice removal of psychology for me, personally. Too much psychology in the recording studio, and a little psychiatry as well.

Were there songs that surprised you by coming out of this chance project that you might not have done otherwise?
None of the songs came out of it. I don't write in the studio at all. I write in bars, and I completely ignore the instrumentation when I'm writing a song. Basically, I write a record, decide what's going to be on it, and I go into the studio.

What was the rationale of having this particular batch of songs go through this recording process?
I had no rationale. I don't think of there being a theme. I actually haven't had a lyrical concept since 69 Love Songs.

Your previous two Magnetic Fields albums sort of commented on each other, with one being very distorted and the other being strictly acoustic, and in this album, the songs all have a similar musical approach. Do you want the records to have very distinct aesthetics?
I don't want to be like Roxy Music and make a slowly evolving palette. I like to react violently against the last record. I never get bored. I like to do whatever I didn't do at all the last time.

Some of the lyrics on the record seem very timely, particularly "The Machine in Your Hand" and "God Wants Us to Wait."
"God Wants Us to Wait" is 28 years old. Not the lyric, but almost everything else about it, it's something I recorded 28 years ago. It was originally 13 minutes long, so making it two minutes long was sort of difficult. The lyrical subject matter, I thought, was well within the mainstream of sex songs, except they're actually lying naked on the floor and only there and then does she say, "Let's wait until we get married." It's sort of the same thing as "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?"

What got cut out to get it down to two minutes?
There were many, many verses. And then there was soloing, sort of. There was a poly-rhythm section, with some things happening in different meters, crashing against each other and coming back into synch. It was made heavily under the influence of Can.

Is your impulse now to keep things very tight and brief?
Yeah. I'm not making it a crusade, as George Bush would say, but I am a fan of short songs. Most of the songs I listen to were recorded before 1970 and most of them originally came out on seven-inch; they're usually under three minutes long, and often under two minutes long.

When you write, do you find that the songs come out around that length, or are you still paring things down?
I think I'm finding that they just come out at that length. I've never really been a fan of the bridge, and I feel like with middle eights, I always write the same middle eight. We have to be careful about that in the setlist.

What inspired the song about smart phones, "The Machine in Your Hand"?
I was sitting around in gay bars, and when I'm writing there, I'm usually writing about what's happening around me, even though I don't seem to realize that at the time. What has increasingly been happening is that people in the gay bars are just staring at their glowing gadgets and literally never looking up except to order another drink. So they may as well not be there at all.

Do you feel that you are susceptible to the same thing with your phone?
Oh, absolutely. I have fallen into the terrible trap of playing Scrabble and Words with Friends. I'm sure in a week or two I will get very tired of this and end all these games, but in the interim, I'm playing word games with four different people, which becomes a full-time job. I think it's like the brief blip in my life, like the two weeks that I played Tetris until I started dreaming Tetris.

You mainly live in Los Angeles now, but you were in New York City for many years. Is there a difference between the gay bars in those cities, and does that influence how you write?
There is a different vibe in the bars in that everyone in California has to drive home, so there aren't people who sit there for eight hours getting drunk, but everyone does in New York. So alcoholism is sadly curtailed in Los Angeles.

Have you had many freelance songwriting jobs recently?
I just had two ad solicitations yesterday. Often [the clients] are uncertain. So if they are really, really uncertain, I'll walk away. I find that the clients at ad agencies don't know what they want, and why should they be able to know what they want? They are very inarticulate about telling you what they want, but they have terrible deadlines. It's a very difficult thing to do, so unless it seems like I will be able to do it with panache, then I think it's best for me not to try because it will probably fall through and have all of us tearing our hair out.

Are you ever approached to write for other artists?
Only by ad agencies, actually. I think it would be fun to write for most anyone, really. I am not fond of my voice, particularly. I'd be perfectly happy to never sing again in public. I would sing less than half the time [on Magnetic Fields records] if I could get away with it, but apparently I can't. I'm told that for commercial purposes, it would be a bad idea for me to stop singing on the records.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here


Amazon MP3 Download Center

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | cheap international calls